<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.rainbowportal.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>XHTML Traditional 1.0 in Alpha 3.0</title><link>http://community.rainbowportal.net/blogs/ramseurs_rainbow_portal_20_blog/archive/2006/03/07/1254.aspx</link><description>Alpha 3.0 passes my normal QA test for a release however I am adding XHTML compliancy to modules before I make a formal release. Anyone, however may go download Alpha 3.0 through anon SVN access over at novell. I have been doing a lot of studying on the</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>re: XHTML Traditional 1.0 in Alpha 3.0</title><link>http://community.rainbowportal.net/blogs/ramseurs_rainbow_portal_20_blog/archive/2006/03/07/1254.aspx#1262</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 20:25:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b5c5565c-83fe-4116-98a0-c7bb06b83fac:1262</guid><dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator><description>IE7 probably has probalye with IE7 scripts....&lt;br&gt;the scripts probably are not needed to be included in IE7 ( real ) and therefor e might be causing conflicts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In general, the HTML that is good for firefox, should be good for IE</description></item><item><title>re: XHTML Traditional 1.0 in Alpha 3.0</title><link>http://community.rainbowportal.net/blogs/ramseurs_rainbow_portal_20_blog/archive/2006/03/07/1254.aspx#1277</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 02:52:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b5c5565c-83fe-4116-98a0-c7bb06b83fac:1277</guid><dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator><description>I can add the filter for you in base page, so that all pages implement it, and we can make it a portal setting option, or an application level option. (probaly application level, as this could have performance implications when it's turned ono, better it's only on for debuging and testing, and getting W3C stamps - which is what the browser file is for ;-)).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: XHTML Traditional 1.0 in Alpha 3.0</title><link>http://community.rainbowportal.net/blogs/ramseurs_rainbow_portal_20_blog/archive/2006/03/07/1254.aspx#1278</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 02:54:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b5c5565c-83fe-4116-98a0-c7bb06b83fac:1278</guid><dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator><description>more interesting.... we can place it as an option on a per module basis.... with a default portal setting.... and a default application setting.... kind of like how web.config has hierarchies.</description></item><item><title>re: XHTML Traditional 1.0 in Alpha 3.0</title><link>http://community.rainbowportal.net/blogs/ramseurs_rainbow_portal_20_blog/archive/2006/03/07/1254.aspx#1280</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 03:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b5c5565c-83fe-4116-98a0-c7bb06b83fac:1280</guid><dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator><description>anyway.... what those filters does, i think asp.net 2.0 does anyway with the setting in web.config &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The default value for the xhtmlConformance element in web.config is Transitional, making your ASP .NET 2.0 apps XHTML compliant without having to try :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but.... we can use mode=&amp;quot;strict&amp;quot; to force even more :-)</description></item><item><title>re: XHTML Traditional 1.0 in Alpha 3.0</title><link>http://community.rainbowportal.net/blogs/ramseurs_rainbow_portal_20_blog/archive/2006/03/07/1254.aspx#1536</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:52:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b5c5565c-83fe-4116-98a0-c7bb06b83fac:1536</guid><dc:creator>Yannick Smits</dc:creator><description>I think you mean:&lt;br&gt;XHTML Transitional not Traditional</description></item></channel></rss>